.
ECCC3 Paper 32

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS.

Previous ab initio studies either at the UHF or at the MP2 and MCSCF levels have not been sucessfull in explaining experimental data.
Therefore, at the UHF level, we investigate the influence of the basis set to check if the problem could be related to a basis set effect .

It is difficult to know when the quality of a basis set is approaching the Hartree-Fock limit. It is a rather elusive notion. Most basis sets thought earlier of Hartree-Fock limit quality, even in the case of a simple triatomic molecule as H2O , are in reality far from said limit. Bawagan and Feller [Bawagan 87] in order to compare electron momentum spectroscopy (EMS) results with ab initio predictions, were obliged to employ basis sets comprising up to 99 gaussians functions.
Since the discrepancy found between EMS experimental results and earlier computationnal results was mainly found in a inaccurate description of the low-momentum outer valence electrons . There is little doubt that for a still slower Rydberg electron, an accurate description would be even more difficult to achieve.

The total electronic energy is not a very sensible indicator of the accuracy of the description of a diffuse orbital.
In order to describe as well as possible the outer "Rydberg" orbital, we employ the following procedure : we inspect the MO coefficients produced by the variational procedure. When the variational procedure gives a large value ( "e.g" 0.5 ) for the smaller exponent, we know that the diffuse space has not been sufficiently described. Then we add yet another more diffuse exponent, until the value of the corresponding MO coefficient goes down under the 0.01 threshold value.
So our constructed basis sets should be large enough to describe correctly the diffuse character of the HOMO.

In the heroic days of quantum chemistry, it was customary of discussing MO coefficients. The not so tedious but worthwhile inspection of MO coefficients is very seldom reported nowadays, probably because of the predominance of a "black box" approach.

A first series of UHF computations were done using four different relatively small basis sets.

A small basis set, denoted , 4-31G/R1 , was constructed as follows : a Gaussian 86 built-in 4-31G split-valence basis set [Poirier 85] is supplemented with diffuse orbitals. On the oxygen atom, we add three sets of s-type gaussian functions with respective exponents 0.10 , 0.050 and 0.025, and one set of p-type functions with exponent 0.025. On each of the three hydrogen atoms, we add one set of s functions with exponent 0.025. The exponent 0.10 is used to represent the overlap of the Rydberg orbital with the valence region, and the exponents 0.050 and 0.025 of the s-type gaussian describe the diffuse 3 s character of the Rydberg electron around the oxygen atom. In order to account for the perturbation to the 3s symmetry of the Rydberg orbital, due to the hydrogen atoms, we add one p-type on the oxygen and one s-type gaussians on the hydrogens.

A second basis used, denoted 4-31G/R2 , was derived from the first basis set, by replacing the exponents 0.050 and 0.025 by 0.061 and 0.024 respectively.

The third basis set used, denoted D95**/R3 is constructed as follow : we take the Gaussian 86 built-in Dunning-Huzinaga full double-zeta basis set [Poirier 85] supplemented by the built-in Gaussian 86 polarization functions [Frisch 86] ; we then add on the oxygen atom two sets of s-type gaussian functions with exponents 0.061 and 0.024 , two sets of p-functions with exponents 0.059 and 0.028 , and one set of d-functions with exponent 0.015. On the hydrogen atoms, we add one set of s functions with exponent 0.08 as well as a set of p functions with exponent 0.08. The exponents 0.061 and 0.024 are derived from the Dunning exponents [Dunning 77] describing the 3s Rydberg orbital on the oxygen, with the recommended splitting factors 0.75 and 1.9. The exponent 0.028 is the 3p Rydberg oxygen exponent of Dunning, and 0.059 is a Dunning intermediate exponent describing a possible ionic character

A fourth more extended basis set is denoted D95**++/R4 . In order to construct the D95**++/R3 basis set, we add to the D95**/R3 basis set, the built-in Gaussian 86 [Frisch 86] diffuse fonctions : one sp gaussian function of exponent 0.0845 on the oxygen, and s gaussian function of exponent 0.036 on the hydrogen atoms . We then add two sets of s-type gaussian functions with exponents 0.10 and 0.0066 on the oxygen atom, and one set of s-type functions with exponent 0.025 on each of the hydrogen atoms. The s-type orbital with exponent 0.10 describes the penetration of the Rydberg electron into the valence region and the very diffuse orbital with exponent 0.0066 is used to check if the Rydberg electron has a further diffuse character. The latter exponent is the Dunning exponent [Dunning 77] for the 4 s orbital around the oxygen atom.

In Table 1 ( cf. infra ), one can find the diffuse exponents related to the different basis sets : 4-31G/R1 , 4-31G/R2 , D95**/R3 and D95**++/R4 .

In a second series of UHF computations, we employed four different large basis set obtained by completing valence bases with an even-tempered expansion of diffuse functions.
We completed a large Van Duijneveldt [Van Duijneveldt 71] , [Poirier 85] valence basis set in three different ways (VD/R5, VD/R6, VD/R7 )
We also used the smaller GAMESS built-in Dunning-Hay valence basis set [Poirier 85] and completed it by an even-tempered expansion ( DH/R8 ).
In Table 1 ( cf. infra ) One can find the number of gaussians related to the different basis sets : VD/R5 , VD/R6 , VD/R7 , DH/R8 .

All computations were performed, over a period of several years, with various ab initio programs such as Gaussian 86 [Frisch 86] Gaussian 88 [Frisch 88] , and mostly GAMESS [Schmidt 93] .
Top page Last page Next page